Who can win World War Three if it can be won at all? - Pravda
이강기2015. 11. 1. 11:28
Who can win World War Three if it can be won
at all?
Pravda(English)
17th June, 2915
Source: Pravda.Ru archive
Russian President Vladimir Putin said at a news conference
after meeting his Finnish counterpart Sauli Niinisto that Russia would aim its
striking forces at the territories that posed a threat to Russia's
security.
"If
someone threatens our security, we will have to aim our striking forces at the
territories, from where the threat comes." According to Putin, it is NATO that
is approaching Russia's borders, but not vice versa.
Russia to aim missiles at the countries that threaten its
security
"We
will be analyzing everything and watching it carefully, but for the time being I
do not see anything that could become a reason for us to worry. These are
political signs expressing attitude to Russia," Putin noted.
Moscow is concerned about such strategic issues as the
deployment of the missile defense system in Europe. "As soon as a threat appears
in a neighboring state, Russia must react accordingly," Putin said. Moscow's
first priority will be to neutralize threats, Putin concluded commenting on the
recent plans from the United states of America to deploy F-22 Raptor fighter
jets in Europe.
Is
there a threat of the Third World War? Can this war be nuclear? Pravda.Ru editor-in-chief
Inna Novikova interviewed Vladimir Kozin, the head of the group of advisors at
the Russian Institute of Strategic Research about the nuclear parity between
Russia and the United States and the lack of control over nuclear
weapons.
"Is there
nuclear parity between Russia and the USA?"
"The last agreement
was signed in April 2010 in Prague. The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty,
START-3, provides for this parity. There is conditional parity on nuclear
carriers and warheads, because the treaty does not limit the reserves of the
United States - 60 percent is a very serious number. In a nutshell, the
Americans can bring back 60 percent of their reserves to considerably increase
their potential."
"I think she does,
and it is a big one. This reserve is not regulated, it can be restored and
brought into a state of combat readiness. The most important thing here is
violation of parity between missile defense and strategic offensive arms in
NATO's favor. Given the amount of tactical nuclear weapons on our doorstep in
Europe, it appears to be a one-sided relationship against Russia.
"The Americans have
five types of tactical nuclear weapons that were left after voluntary reductions
during the 80s and the 90s. The USA has gravity bombs. The Pentagon has five
types of nuclear bombs, but they are regarded as strategic offensive weapons
only if they are carried by heavy strategic bombers. Those bombers can fly at a
distance of 18,000 kilometers - this covers all of Russia's
territory.
"Sea-launched
cruise missiles are not regulated in nuclear arsenals at all, and the Americans
can use them too, as part of the Prompt Global Strike concept. This is a highly
effective weapon that can fly for thousands of kilometers."
"The nuclear
weapons of Russia and the United States can destroy planet Earth five or ten
times in a row. one time will be enough for all people. Why so many weapons,
what are they for?"
"The Americans have
used nuclear weapons twice after they built nuclear bombs in 1945. They had an
intention to use nuclear weapons seven times in various regional conflicts. The
American concept of a massive nuclear attack remains unchanged. The plan of
attack exists to this day, and every US president modifies it to fit
circumstances. At the end of 1945, the USA developed a plan to attack 17 cities
of the Soviet Union. Today, the Americans have 3,500 targets in
Russia.
"We do not have
such symmetrical measures. on the American side of the Pacific and Atlantic
oceans, Russia does not have any missile, strategic, offensive or tactical
weapons. Russia does not conduct military drills in Latin America
either.
"Under the Treaty
of Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces from 1987, signed by Gorbachev and George
H.W. Bush, we destroyed twice as many missiles than the Americans did. We had a
romantic period with NATO in late 80s and 90s. There were 18 cooperation
programs, we used to be strategic
partners. Today, we are strategic
adversaries. None of those 18 programs work. It is the USA that stands behind
this confrontation. Fifty percent of NATO's funding comes from America. At the
same time, NATO is a tool that executes 100 percent of USA's interests. This is
very good business."