國際

Should India get its cows off the streets?

이강기 2015. 11. 18. 21:53
  
  
  
  
  
  

        

 

Should India get its cows off the streets?

Nimisha Jaiswal 

Global Post

Nov 15, 2015 @ 9:42 PM

A cow walks down a street in the old city of Ahmedabad on November 16, 2012.

AFP/Getty Images

NEW DELHI, India — Animals hold a lot of social and political significance in India. Hindus consider the cow sacred, Muslims find the pig impure, and Parsis are put on towers of silence after death to be eaten by vultures. 

For most Indians, though, these creatures aren’t just religious symbols — they’re neighbors. The country’s biggest cities are filled with urban wildlife, most noticeably the millions of stray cows and dogs living on India’s streets. 

In New Delhi, for example, it’s not unusual to find a cow loitering, unperturbed, in the middle of the road. Unafraid of traffic, they often cause logjams or accidents, as speeding vehicles stop dead or swerve to avoid hitting the holy creatures. Commuters, however frustrated by the delay, can do nothing but try to convince the cow to move along, because hurting one in any way would enrage Hindus.

A herd of cows in Ahmedabad, Nov. 16, 2012.

PUNIT PARANJPE/AFP/Getty Images

Stray dogs and puppies are not treated as gently. Many Indians love, feed and care for the street dogs in their neighborhoods, but others consider them an annoyance — even a danger. Some dogs get aggressive, and in a country where rabies is endemic, a bite can prove fatal. 

What to do about stray dogs is now a matter for India’s Supreme Court. on Nov. 18, judges will decide whether local governments have the authority to kill street dogs that are a “nuisance” to people.

Their ruling could affect hundreds of thousands of strays in states like Kerala, where authorities face a dilemma over how to control a vast canine population. The state is estimated to have more than 200,000 stray dogs on its streets and residents have long demanded action to reduce their numbers, with some vigilantes even taking matters into their own hands. 

Any proposal to cull dogs has met with fierce opposition from animal rights activists all over India, however, who this summer called on foreign travelers to boycott Kerala — which depends heavily on tourism — over alleged animal cruelty. The Animal Welfare Board of India, which advises the government on animal policy, filed a petition in July with the Supreme Court in a bid to block indiscriminate culling. 

Instead, the board invokes rules established in 2001 that require local authorities to vaccinate and sterilize street dogs, while allowing them to euthanize only dogs that are fatally ill or injured.

“[These rules] are not being followed, in most places,” S. Chinny Krishna, vice chairman of the Animal Welfare Board, told GlobalPost. “We have the finest animal welfare laws in the world, bar none, but implementation is virtually zero.” 

If the Supreme Court rules against culling next week, Krishna hopes that it will convince states to invest in sterilization and vaccination programs, which he says are a more humane, safer and more effective way to control the population of stray dogs and prevent the spread of rabies. 

Homeless people and animals warm themselves around a fire in Allahabad, January 23, 2013.

Sanjay Kanojia/AFP/Getty Images

If the treatment of street dogs is hotly debated, India’s street cows are largely ignored. They, too, can be a nuisance and a danger to city dwellers, and the animals themselves risk being hit by speeding vehicles or grazing on poisonous waste. And yet no policy exists to govern their care, control or removal.

“As far as stray cows are concerned, [the rules] vary from state to state and from local body to local body,” said Krishna. “There are no nationwide rules.”

The Delhi High Court ordered all stray cattle to be removed from the streets of the capital in 2002, but the animals can frequently be seen chewing wayside trash here and in other cities.

Where do they come from? According to PETA India, bulls, male calves and cows that have “dried out” are often turned out of dairy farms because they do not produce milk. Some farmers sell such cattle to slaughterhouses, but many others are discouraged by religious objections and the rise of militant Hindu “cow protection” groups, who have taken to attacking trucks that transport cattle and beating up farmers who they suspect of sending cows to their death. Abandoning cows is often considered the safer option.

According to Nikunj Sharma, one of PETA India’s campaign strategists, even cows that aren’t abandoned often find themselves on the streets — illegal dairies cut costs by allowing the cows to feed themselves off waste lying in the road. 

A sacred cow rummages for food in New Delhi, September 26, 2005.

Uriel Sinai/Getty Images

Some attempts have been made at a local level to regulate illegal dairies and mandate proper care of cattle. City authorities are usually directed to impound street cows, release them to owners for a fee, and auction or rehome unclaimed animals. Some local governments have their own cowsheds, where confiscated or ownerless cattle are taken to live out their days.  

Yet these “retirement” sheds are not necessarily a happy ending either. Twenty years ago, the Delhi government created 10 such shelters. By last year, only five survived, amid complaints of a lack of funding or oversight. Out of 49,000 cows kept in these shelters, authorities reported in 2011, 46,000 died in three years. 

Many of the animals are severely malnourished by the time they reach a new home, caretakers say. Trash, plastic, shoes and even metal is found in their stomachs. 

In a country where eating beef can get you killed, cows seem to get a lot more of India’s attention when they’re dead than they do when they’re alive. 

 

India's biggest festival is really bad for its health

Indians wave sparklers as they celebrate the Hindu festival Diwali on the banks of the Yamuna river in the northern city of Vrindavan, Oct. 21, 2014.

AFP/Getty Images

NEW DELHI, India — In the week leading up to the Hindu festival of Diwali, which falls this year on Nov. 11, every neighborhood in India becomes more beautiful. Houses are cleaned out, decorative lamps are lit, families reunite and gifts are exchanged. Diwali is considered to be the Hindu new year, the day on which winter “officially” arrives, and a time to pray for prosperity by felicitating the goddess of wealth.

It is also the day that air pollution across India spikes to five to eight times above the safe standard.

 

Two practices define Diwali — lighting earthen lamps all over the house, and setting off firecrackers. According to children’s rights NGO Bachpan Bachao Andolan, India produces nearly $38 million worth of firecrackers every year, most of which are sold in the weeks leading up to Diwali. Entire towns are dedicated to the manufacture of these fireworks. Every Indian child grows up knowing the names of each different kind.

Many Indian children, though, are too familiar with firecrackers — because they make them.

“During the festive season thousands of children are trafficked and used as cheap labor … and made to work in very hazardous conditions where a blast or tiny spark often leads to accidents,” says R.S. Chaurasia, the chairperson of Bachpan Bachao Andolan, which is currently campaigning against fireworks.

Chaurasia gave the example of Sivakasi town in the state of Tamil Nadu, which he said was home to 80 percent of India’s fireworks production. Fatal accidents and fires in its factories are an annual affair. According to Chaurasia, ignoring safety measures and hiring children allows for massive profit margins.

Consumers aren’t safe, either. Fire hazards and burn injuries during celebrations are common. And according to the Center for Science and Environment (CSE), a policy research organization, standards for what goes into fireworks are either non-existent or not imposed, allowing firecrackers to emit abundant toxic fumes into the environment.

 

CSE readings show that levels of carbon dioxide and particulate matter — particles of pollution suspended in the air — increase significantly during the festivities leading up to Diwali, and are the highest on the day itself. Last Diwali in Delhi, for example, the center recorded a level of PM2.5 — measuring the fine particulate matter that can enter the lungs and bloodstream — that was ten times the recommended standard. It was three times as high as Delhi’s average real levels, which are already considered unsafe.

“The body’s filtering mechanism doesn’t work against this small particulate matter,” Polash Mukherjee, a research associate at the CSE who has worked extensively on firecracker emissions, told GlobalPost. “It causes an exaggeration of respiratory illnesses, and the most affected group is really young children.”

Smog covers the New Delhi skyline the morning after Diwali celebrations, Oct. 24, 2014.

PRAKASH SINGH/AFP/Getty Images

Advocates recently came up with a novel way to highlight the problem: They petitioned the Supreme Court on behalf of their infant children. Two 6-month-olds and a 14-month-old appealed for immediate restrictions on the use of fireworks on the basis of their fundamental right to life and clean air.

“Our lungs have not yet fully developed and we cannot take further pollution through bursting of crackers,” said the petition, drafted by the toddlers’ families. “The smoke … during the festivals of Dussehra [a Hindu celebration in October] and Diwali virtually clogs the atmosphere and magnifies the risk of contracting lung diseases.”

Unsurprisingly, a Sivakasi-based group opposed the plea, claiming that the lives of 1.3 million employees of the firecracker industry would be affected. 

 

The Supreme Court responded that the use of loud fireworks between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. is already prohibited to limit noise pollution, and said that an all-out ban was unrealistic. It turned down the petition, instead reprimanding the government for not publishing public service advertisements discouraging firecrackers as it had asked in a ruling 10 years ago. 

 

More from GlobalPost: India is learning what happens when you treat sanitation workers like garbage

 

The reluctance of authorities to take action in the face of all the evidence comes down to a combination of religious zeal and environmental apathy. Hindus say it is their religious right to set off firecrackers, while manufacturers insist that any spike in pollution from their products is only temporary. Amid India’s chronically dirty air, industry leaders argue, a few festivities are not a factor in the country’s respiratory problems. 

Experts contest both assertions. Several campaigns against firecrackers point out that while lamps are a symbolic part of Diwali celebrations, firecrackers are purely celebratory — which means they could easily be curtailed, if not banned, without keeping Hindus from their religious rites.

The question of pollution is even harder to ignore. According to Mukherjee of the CSE, the air pollution around Diwali aggravates the ill effects of Delhi’s notoriously smoggy winter on people with respiratory problems. And the problem is not limited to temporary carbon dioxide and particulate matter levels. 

“[Firecrackers also release] elements like heavy metals, which stay in the atmosphere for a long time and percolate into underground water, and stay in the soil for a much longer period,” Mukherjee said. Extended exposure can affect the kidneys, liver and the central nervous system. 

And however temporary some festive air pollution may be, it adds to the problem of survival in India’s metropolitan cities. “People are leaving Delhi,” said Mukherjee. “Expatriates are returning to their own countries because they say Delhi is not safe for their kids, but we have to work here.”